In my corner of the world I can see for miles and miles. Is there a connection between the US government walking guns across the Mexican border and the problems the Benghazi-Hussein Obama administration has garnered in Libya?
On the surface, "Fast and Furious" was a bone headed plan to drum up angst among soccer moms and force a critical mass to come together so something could finally be done about American ownership and rights to bear arms. Armed Americans can be dangerous. Despots want to deal with sheep and not wolves whenever possible.
Countries without nuclear weapons are sheep, those with, are wolves. In a carnivorous world where sheep are sheared and eaten, it is no wonder Iran is risking everything to acquire wolf status. It is only natural the Iranians do not wish to be pulled apart by the countries which have the wolf.
Is the policy of the Benghazi-Hussein Obama administration to keep the middle eastern sheep bleating and colliding into one another to cause a distraction while the wolves pick off the choice resources?
Oil? Is this all about oil? Well what else does the region offer the world? Dates? I spit upon you, who can eat dates when there are cheeseburgers at Wendys. Olives? Are you kidding? Who would eat these if there are almonds and peanuts available?
The Middle East was cut up into countries to maximize internal strife and keep the people off balance and fighting among themselves making the slow drip, drip, drip of oil out of their region almost unnoticed. Now with the advent of the Internet, the Wolves are having to be very careful what they do to the sheep and subterfuge is a requirement. Drop the state of Israel into the melee and guarantee strife and unrest for a century. Meanwhile the oil keeps on flowing and the wolves keep on growing.
The whole of the Western Man's Mideast policy could be summed up in one word. "Stampede."
The US foreign policy is better served by strife than peace in the Middle East. Hillary Clinton armed the Libyan rebels, who are now, if not then known to be Al Qaida affiliates, and her state department denied Ambassador Stevens' request to beef up security.
The death of the ambassador in Libya was bad for President Obama's flagging campaign against Mitt Romney. The pop-up video excuse was not well thought out. I believe this has all the hallmarks of a Clinton hit against the President which should be viewed as a political coup de tat.
Who gains if Obama fails to be re-elected? The Clintons know full well that Hillary's biological doomsday clock is ticking off the final years with her fast and furiously approaching her 70's where even Obamacare does not find people in this age group a good risk. The Clintons are players and are not ready to be placed into early retirement out and away from the perks of politics.
President Obama, and his Chicago thuggery has shown them how far the American people can be pushed and they are kicking themselves everyday that they didn't think of that. Hillary can run in 2016, if she can keep from being stained by the Benghazi mess. Her health may not cooperate however given the risks Obamacare will bring to our elderly if fully implemented.
What is Chelsea doing?
Jackson Delano Maybolt, President Urban Poverty Law Center
No comments:
Post a Comment